`

How Could Vista Starter Edition Bring Us Any Lower

Posted by andry
on Wednesday, May 09

Vista Starter Edition Box

I was stunned by this Wikipedia entry about Vista Edition.

Much like Windows XP Starter Edition, this edition will be limited to emerging markets such as Brazil, Colombia, India, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines, mainly to offer a legal alternative to using unauthorized copies. It will not be available in the United States, Canada, Europe, or Australia.[4] It will have many significant limitations, such as only allowing a user to launch three applications with a user interface at once, not accepting incoming network connections, a physical memory limit of 256 MB, and will run only in 32-bit mode.[5] Additionally, only AMD’s Duron, Sempron and Geode processors, and Intel’s Celeron and Pentium III processors are supported.

Not accepting incoming network connections. Hm.. they still allow me to use flash disk, right?

It works only on Pentium III class? No problem. You don’t need much too run Visual Bla Bla Bla Express and NAnt.

Only 256 MB memory allowed? My old PC five years ago, only had 224MB SDRAM (64 + 64 + 64 + 32) and I ran it for VB6/VC++ on top of transactional COM+ and beautifully designed asynchronous MSMQ distributed applications adhering to Windows DNA architecture with Oracle 9i’s SGA/PGA-raped. 256MB is enough.

But this Vista Starter Edition, aim to address Indonesia market, allows a user to launch only three applications at time.

Three?

Let’s see.

A minesweeper. One application.
Wordpad readme.doc. Two applications.
Excellent Roeder’s .NET Reflector coming up. Three applications.
Notepa…. uups. You’ll get a friendly i18n-compatible WM_WINDOWS modal carved with a message like: “You must buy or upgrade Vista to run Notepad file4.txt”.

Is that an exact definition of three applications with user interface at a time?

Are we, Indonesian people, really that bad so they only allow us to run three applications?

Are we really that low?

Maybe I am a thief.
It is true that I prioritize open source platform over proprietary. I never give up hope in Gimp no matter how suck it is. Feeding my ego and idealism, sometime I pray to God so my hand never get dirty with .NET again. I spare my time to read about why fonts don’t created equals just to get Verdana and Arial works in OpenOffice. I even dig really deep on many proprietary multimedia format articles just to get my Totem start sound something other than Nelson Mandela rumbled about selling guns in Africa (or worst, deep-hack ALSA server modprobe: “Hello, I’m Linus Torvalds. And I pronounce Linux as lih-nucks”).
I’m a daily Linux user plugged with many open sources agendas, but ironically I still spend some time, walking down Sabang and Mangga Dua, looking for pirated Spiderman 3 DVD to test whether my GStreamer Plugin works fine or not.

So yes, I’m a hypocrite thief. Many of my fellow countrymen are.

Maybe I’m a poor.
I only get average paid-rate. New York construction workers get paid 19$ an hour. We’re considered lucky to get 19$ a day. I work overtime, without ever getting any sign of three-weeks paid vacation, to get crumble with XML files, scattered *.properties, classpath loading nightmare, AJAX request cross browser hell, intermingled DWR/Prototype/Dojo, flame-wars daily read, SVN repository out-of-sync, failing unit test, undetected bugs, ignorant IKIWISI archetype clients, an impatient boss, and blood sucking HR department.

So yes, I’m a poor. Many of my fellow countrymen are.

But then again, Vista Starter Edition, designed for Indonesia and other poor-thief countries, allows only three applications at a time?

I’m insulted.
Even a lowliest hypocrite poor-thief has some kind of dignity, at least to run many applications at a time as he/she wish.

Comments

Leave a response

  1. andriansahMay 09, 2007 @ 10:12 AM
    this must be joking right? but hey, there's chance for GNU operating system like ubuntu and friends :)
  2. DedhiMay 09, 2007 @ 10:30 AM
    May be Microsoft thinks that most of the people in the emerging countries are dumb. Having brain as small as peanut, so managing more than 3 of the applications will make the brain overloaded.
  3. Endy MuhardinMay 09, 2007 @ 10:34 AM
    Why bother ... use Ubuntu Feisty instead. Run faster, less hardware requirement, equipped with better apps. Can't live without Windows? Get yourself a VirtualBox, install Windows XP inside it. Feed it with 256MB of memory. Several years ago, I use Linux for idealism purposes. Nowadays, I use Linux because it's simply better. Nuff said
  4. ZalfanyMay 09, 2007 @ 11:32 AM
    Isn't the starter edition of Windows XP having more or less the same limitation? It was released back in 2004 (http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/aug04/08-11WinXPStarterPilotPR.mspx). If they do the same with Vista, perhaps because it really does work and somehow somewhere people find it useful?
  5. akMay 09, 2007 @ 11:34 AM
    Vista on 256MB of RAM, that got to be joking. Oh wait they only allow 3 applications at a time 256 should be enough! 250MB for Vista and 2MB for each opened application. Sweet!
  6. VavaiMay 09, 2007 @ 12:00 PM
    #AK - Rendy, very funny... It's simply live without Vista. Nice article, Andry. Off course !
  7. fahmi!May 09, 2007 @ 03:32 PM
    ooo... vista nggak asik yo ndry? yo wes tetep windows 98 ae hehehe, nggak butuh kompyuter larang2 :D lagian wes apal serial'e K4HVD bla bla blah... hahahaaa
  8. Firman FirdausMay 09, 2007 @ 04:12 PM
    seburuk itu ya?
  9. HardjonoMay 09, 2007 @ 04:44 PM
    I think this has to do with the $3 per license cost for Windows on OLPC (see my blog on OLPC laptops). And yes, Indonesia memang terkenal sebagai pembajak software... :)
  10. akMay 09, 2007 @ 06:03 PM
    @Hardjono: The OLPC is already good with Linux. This is more related to the old Windows XP Starter Edition which has similar restrictions (3 apps at a time).
  11. WibisonoMay 10, 2007 @ 12:32 AM
    Microsoft do what they gotta do, we do what we gotta do. Just like Endy, use Linux coz its better and generous.
  12. ObyektifMay 10, 2007 @ 03:02 AM
    > Are we really that low? > Maybe I am a thief. You said so. > So yes, I’m a hypocrite thief. Many of my fellow countrymen are. Please, be yourself. > Maybe I’m a poor. Then use (or buy) something else cheaper. > So yes, I’m a poor. Many of my fellow countrymen are. Even if you are poor, you dont have to be a thief nor hypocrite. > I’m insulted. Again, you dont have to. If you cannot afford it, choose something else. This thing (Windows Vista) is not for you. There is something else which could be better: Linux. Educate yourself and your countrymen to not steal (being a thief).
  13. AndryMay 10, 2007 @ 06:52 AM
    Endy, Obyektif:
    As the matter of fact, when I insert tthis Vista Readiness Kit DVD, I boot my notebook on Feisty.
    Reading those Wikipedia, which is included in that DVD, I get this funny feeling and I feel "obligated" to say it loud and clear. Why we should pay for item A that is no better than item B whilst we can get item B for free. Not only for sake of idealism or any thief-poor thingy I've been writing about, it's about taking control our own desktop.
    I do have a plan to bought myself a MacBookPro (which is, well, propietary). Honest. But after I have wonderful desktop with fascinating and limitless possibility with Linux --Feisty Fawn on my notebook and Debian on server--, I think I'm gonna hold that idea.
    I'm not bashing Vistas' users, and other propietary OS users for that matter. I'm concern.
  14. dnialMay 11, 2007 @ 08:51 AM
    One more reason not to use Vista. Gosh! What are those people thingking? Office 2007 interface sucks, now Vista limitation. Damn!
  15. eryMay 18, 2007 @ 01:29 PM
    oh ya...Vista with 256ram, yeah i was tried it with small crack, it was work fine on my PC right know. i use vista ultimate edition with mangga dua edition... ha.... ha... that's indonesian edition
  16. sansanMay 21, 2007 @ 01:12 PM
    Dear All, Vista Starter edition can use network. I try my stock on my shop to use on demo computer. Its fine. I'm using P4 3000 + 512Mb,Intel Mainboard all fine
  17. richieMay 30, 2007 @ 11:16 PM
    The Wikipedia article was wrong the RAM limit is actually 1GB